Alonso v. Blackstone Financial Group, LLC et al

Filing 78

ORDER requiring plaintiff to file a response to defendants' request for modification of the pretrial order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/16/2013. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSARIO ALONSO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. BLACKSTONE FINANCIAL GROUP. LLC, et al., Case No. 1:11-cv-01693-SAB ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF THE PRETRIAL ORDER (ECF No. 77) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This action is set for trial on November 13, 2013, and on October 7, 2013, the pretrial 19 order issued. (ECF No. 75.) On October 15, 2013, Defendants filed a request for modification of 20 the pretrial order to amend their exhibit list. (ECF No. 77.) 21 Pursuant to the pretrial order, “[n]o exhibit, other than those listed . . . may be admitted 22 unless the parties stipulate or upon a showing that this order should be modified to prevent 23 ‘manifest injustice.’ ” (Pretrial Order 9:26-28, ECF No. 75.) Defendants’ request does not set 24 forth that the parties have stipulated to the modification of the exhibit list or show any manifest 25 injustice that would result from the failure to include these exhibits. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ request on or before October 17, 2013. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 October 16, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?