Alonso v. Blackstone Financial Group, LLC et al

Filing 83

ORDER requiring defendants to file a response to plaintiff's request for modification of the pretrial order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/28/2013. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSARIO ALONSO, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. BLACKSTONE FINANCIAL GROUP. LLC, et al., Case No. 1:11-cv-01693-SAB ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF THE PRETRIAL ORDER (ECF No. 82) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This action is set for trial on November 13, 2013, and on October 7, 2013, the pretrial 19 order issued. (ECF No. 75.) On October 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for modification of the 20 pretrial order to amend her exhibit list. (ECF No. 82.) Local Rule 230(b) requires the opposing 21 party to file an opposition, if any, or statement of non-opposition. 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s request on or before October 29, 2013. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: October 28, 2013 _ 27 _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?