Alonso v. Blackstone Financial Group, LLC et al
Filing
83
ORDER requiring defendants to file a response to plaintiff's request for modification of the pretrial order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/28/2013. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROSARIO ALONSO,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
BLACKSTONE FINANCIAL GROUP.
LLC, et al.,
Case No. 1:11-cv-01693-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
MODIFICATION OF THE PRETRIAL ORDER
(ECF No. 82)
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
This action is set for trial on November 13, 2013, and on October 7, 2013, the pretrial
19
order issued. (ECF No. 75.) On October 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for modification of the
20
pretrial order to amend her exhibit list. (ECF No. 82.) Local Rule 230(b) requires the opposing
21
party to file an opposition, if any, or statement of non-opposition.
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file an opposition or
statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s request on or before October 29, 2013.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
October 28, 2013
_
27
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?