Ransom v. Herrera et al
Filing
133
ORDER RE: Plaintiff's Letter signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 04/06/2018. Responses due by 5/9/2018.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
LEONARD RANSOM, JR.,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S LETTER
(ECF NO. 130)
DANNY HERRERA and RICKY
BRANNUM,
16
Case No. 1:11-cv-01709-LJO-EPG (PC)
30-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
17
18
Leonard Ransom, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
19
20
rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
21
On March 26, 2018, Plaintiff filed a letter. (ECF No. 130). According to the letter,
22
Plaintiff sent a check to the United States Marshals Service in the amount of $146.54.
23
However, the Court has contacted the United States Marshals Service, and it appears that it did
24
not receive the payment. Accordingly, the Court will give Plaintiff thirty days to file evidence
25
that he made the payment. Alternatively, if for some reason Plaintiff’s payment did not go
26
through, Plaintiff will be given thirty days to resubmit the payment and submit evidence that he
27
did so.
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days
2
from the date of service of this order to either: 1) File evidence that he made the payment for
3
service of the subpoenas; or 2) Resubmit the payment and submit evidence that he did so.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 6, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?