Ransom v. Herrera et al
Filing
144
ORDER Re: Defendants' Request for Clarification Regarding Due Date for Plaintiff's Discovery Responses 141 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/23/2018. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
LEONARD RANSOM, JR.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
DANNY HERRERA and RICKY
BRANNUM,
15
Case No. 1:11-cv-01709-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR
CLARIFICATION REGARDING DUE DATE
FOR PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY
RESPONSES
(ECF NO. 141)
Defendants.
16
17
18
On April 20, 2018, Defendants requested clarification regarding whether the Court
19
granted Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to their discovery requests at the discovery
20
and status conference. (ECF No. 141). Defendants seek clarification in order to determine
21
whether a motion to compel is appropriate at this time.
22
The Court did not grant Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to the discovery
23
requests at issue. A motion to compel appears appropriate from Defendants’ description of
24
discovery status.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated:
April 23, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?