Ransom v. Herrera et al

Filing 144

ORDER Re: Defendants' Request for Clarification Regarding Due Date for Plaintiff's Discovery Responses 141 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/23/2018. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 LEONARD RANSOM, JR., Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. DANNY HERRERA and RICKY BRANNUM, 15 Case No. 1:11-cv-01709-LJO-EPG (PC) ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING DUE DATE FOR PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY RESPONSES (ECF NO. 141) Defendants. 16 17 18 On April 20, 2018, Defendants requested clarification regarding whether the Court 19 granted Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to their discovery requests at the discovery 20 and status conference. (ECF No. 141). Defendants seek clarification in order to determine 21 whether a motion to compel is appropriate at this time. 22 The Court did not grant Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to the discovery 23 requests at issue. A motion to compel appears appropriate from Defendants’ description of 24 discovery status. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: April 23, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?