Ransom v. Herrera et al
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Copy of Defendant Brannum's Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING Extension of Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant Brannum's Motion to Dismiss 50 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/26/16: 30-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
1:11-cv-01709-LJO-EPG (PC)
LEONARD RANSOM, JR.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR COPY OF DEFENDANT
BRANNUM’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND
GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT BRANNUM’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
(ECF NO. 50)
Plaintiff,
v.
DANNY HERRERA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Leonard Ransom, Jr. (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights
20
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. On July 7, 2016, defendant Brannum filed a motion to
21
dismiss. (ECF No. 38). On September 1, 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an opposition
22
or a statement of non-opposition to defendant Brannum’s motion to dismiss within thirty days
23
of the service of the order. (ECF. No. 47). On September 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed a response to
24
that order, stating that he never received a copy of defendant Brannum’s motion to dismiss and
25
asking for a copy of the motion. (ECF No. 49). On September 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a
26
motion requesting a copy of defendant Brannum’s motion to dismiss.
27
According to Plaintiff’s motion, he never received a copy of defendant Brannum’s motion to
28
dismiss.
1
(ECF. No. 50).
1
Based on Plaintiff’s uncontroverted assertions, it appears that Plaintiff never received a
2
copy of defendant Brannum’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk
3
of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of defendant Brannum’s motion to dismiss (ECF
4
No. 38).
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of the service
6
of this order to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant Brannum’s
7
motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order the Court will deem the failure to
8
respond as a waiver and may recommend that defendant Brannum’s motion to dismiss be
9
granted on that basis.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 26, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?