Pulido v. Igbinosa, et al.
Filing
7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/14/2012. Show Cause Response due within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
RAFAEL PULIDO,
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
Case No. 1:11-cv-01711-DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ECF No. 6
F. IGBINOSA, et al.,
12
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
Defendants.
13
Plaintiff Rafael Pulido (“Plaintiff’) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department
14
15
of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
16
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed his complaint. On July 30,
17
2012, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim, with leave
18
to amend within thirty days. ECF No. 6. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an
19
amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within twenty-one
20
21
(21) days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. If Plaintiff fails to
22
show cause or otherwise timely respond, the Court will dismiss this action for failure to obey a court
23
order and failure to state a claim.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
26
27
28
/s/ Dennis
September 14, 2012
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
3b142a
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
