Maldonado v. Yates et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DISMISSING Action, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted Under Section 1983; ORDER That Dismissal is Subject to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/13/2013. CASE CLOSED (Strike) (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

BILLY RAE MALDONADO,

11
12
13
14

1:11-cv-01735-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 17.)

vs.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY
BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

JAMES YATES, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT
TO 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(G)

17

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

18
19

Billy Rae Maldonado (Aplaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

20

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

21

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22

On May 7, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this

23

action be dismissed based on plaintiff=s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

24

granted under §1983. On May 20, 2013, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and

25

recommendations.

26
27

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

28
1

1

including Plaintiff’s objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and proper analysis.

3

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

4

1.

5

The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on May 7,
2013, are adopted in full;

6

2.

7

This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff=s failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983;

8

3.

9

This dismissal is subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. '
1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011); and

10

4.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

14
15
16

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

June 13, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

b9ed48bb

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2