Martinez v. Allison et al

Filing 59

ORDER Regarding 52 Motion, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 11/20/14.(Defendant J. Davis is directed to serve and file redacted copy of 05/19/11, interview by Internal Affairs by 12/1/2014) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:11-cv-001749-RRB Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION AT DOCKET 52 vs. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, et al., Defendants. At Docket 52 Defendant J. Davis has filed a Motion for Protective Order to Redact Portions of Documents Produced Pursuant to October 15, 2014, Order entered at Docket 45.1 Defendant has also submitted the unredacted documents to the Court for in camera review. Although Davis submitted the unredacted copy of his interview by Internal Affairs in camera, the Motion at Docket 52 does not have attached to it a redacted copy of that interview. Accordingly, not later than December 1, 2014, Defendant J. Davis is directed to serve and file the redacted copy of his May 19, 2011, interview by Internal Affairs. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of November, 2014. S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 In that Order the Court directed Defendant to produce transcripts of the interviews conducted by Internal Affairs of the Defendant, C/O J. Davis, and all percipient witnesses into the allegations made by Plaintiff in his Complaint. Attached to the motion at Docket 52 and served on the Plaintiff, Ronald F. Martinez, were the redacted transcripts of the interviews of C/O S. Beasley, Sgt. D. Johnson, C/O Vasquez, and C/O T. Alcantar. ORDER REGARDING MOTION AT DOCKET 52

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?