Jeremy Jones v. Chen et al
Filing
58
ORDER Granting In Part Motion For Extension Of Time (ECF No. 57 ), February 16, 2015 Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/6/2015. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JEREMY JONES,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01762-MJS (PC)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
(ECF No. 57)
DR. CHEN,
FEBRUARY 16, 2015 DEADLINE
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against
Defendant Chen on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment inadequate medical care claim. (ECF
No. 22.)
Defendant seeks an extension of time to February 19, 2015 to file his pretrial
statement on the grounds that Plaintiff received an extension of time and defense
counsel has other deadlines in other cases. (ECF No. 57.) Although the details of
defense counsel’s deadlines were not provided to the Court, the Court will assume that
such deadlines provide good cause for a limited extension of time. At the same time,
however, the Court requires adequate time to prepare for the February 26, 2015
telephonic trial confirmation hearing, and is unwilling to postpone the hearing because
27
28
1
1
defense counsel is unable to timely prepare a pretrial statement due to vague and
2
unspecified deadlines in other cases.
3
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s request for extension of
4
time (ECF No. 57) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant’s time to file a pretrial statement is
5
hereby extended to February 16, 2015.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 6, 2015
/s/
9
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?