Aaron McCoy v. Tann et al

Filing 86

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/13/2015. Settlement Conference set for 6/5/2015 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield at 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

AARON MCCOY,

11

Case No. 1:11-cv-1771-LJO-MJS (PC)

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

M. TANN, et al.,

14

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendants.

15
16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

17

rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has determined that this

18

case will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to

19

Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for the Court’s Settlement Week program to

20

conduct a settlement conference at the U.S. District Court, 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

21

California 93301 on June 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

22
23

A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue
concurrently with this order.

24

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Jennifer

26

L. Thurston on June 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 510 19th

27

Street, Bakersfield, California 93301.

28

1

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a

1

binding settlement shall attend in person.1

2
3

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and

4

damages. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to

5

this order to appear in person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In

6

addition, the conference will not proceed and will be reset to another date.

7

4. At least 21 days before the settlement conference, plaintiff SHALL submit to

8

defendant, by mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful

9

settlement demand, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

10

settlement is appropriate, not to exceed ten pages in length. Thereafter, no

11

later than 14 days before the settlement conference, defendant SHALL

12

respond, by telephone or in person, with an acceptance of the offer or with a

13

meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

14

settlement is appropriate. If settlement is achieved, defense counsel is to

15

immediately inform the courtroom deputy of Magistrate Judge Thurston.

16

5. If settlement is not achieved informally, each party shall provide a confidential

17

settlement statement to Sujean Park, ADR Division, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200,

18

Sacramento, California 95814, or by email to [e-mail] so

19

they arrive no later than May 29, 2015 and file a “Notice of Submission of

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d
1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in
mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals
attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at
that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat
Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d
1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion
and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pittman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc.,
216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL
23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman,
216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to
comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97
(8th Cir. 2001).
1

2

Confidential Settlement Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).

1
2
3

Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the court nor

4

served on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked

5

“confidential” with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated

6

prominently thereon.

7

The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in

8

length, typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

9

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

10

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other

11

grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the

12

parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a

13

description of the major issues in dispute.

14

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

15

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

16

pretrial, and trial.

17

e. The relief sought.

18

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers
and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.

19

g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement

20

conference.

21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 13, 2015

/s/

25

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

Michael J. Seng

3