Goolsby v. Cate et al
Filing
24
ORDER Dismissing Certain Claims, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/7/2013. Pursuant to Plaintiff's June 3, 2013, notice, the Court DISMISSES all access to courts claims in the FAC. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
THOMAS GOOLSBY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
) 1:11cv01773 DLB PC
)
)
) ORDER DISMISSING
) CERTAIN CLAIMS
)
)
)
)
)
16
Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
17
18
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
19
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action
20
on October 25, 2011.1
21
22
On February 6, 2013, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The Court
screened the FAC on May 20, 2013, and found that it states a First Amendment retaliation claim
23
against Defendants Gentry, Noyce, Eubanks, Tyree, Medrano, Holman, Holland and Steadman,
24
25
26
27
28
and violation of due process claims against Defendants Eubanks, Tyree, Medrano, Holland and
Gutierrez. The Court also dismissed certain claims and certain Defendants without leave to
amend.
1
On December 5, 2011, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge.
1
1
2
3
On June 3, 3013, Plaintiff notified the Court that he would proceed on the cognizable
claims and would not amend the access to courts claim. Plaintiff has been instructed on service
by separate order.
4
Therefore, pursuant to Plaintiff’s June 3, 2013, notice, the Court DISMISSES all access
5
to courts claims in the FAC.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
10
/s/ Dennis
June 7, 2013
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
DEAC_Signature-END:
9b0hied
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?