Goolsby v. Cate et al

Filing 39

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default 35 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/17/13. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THOMAS GOOLSBY, 1:11cv01773 DLB PC 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 10 GENTRY, et al., (Document 35) 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on October 25, 2011.1 17 18 19 On June 7, 2013, the Court issued an order finding service of the First Amended Complaint appropriate as to Defendants Gentry, Noyce, Eubanks, Tyree, Medrano, Holman, Holland, Steadman and Gutierrez and requiring Plaintiff to return service documents within thirty days. 20 21 Plaintiff submitted service documents on July 18, 2013, and the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve Defendants by order dated July 19, 2013. 22 23 On December 6, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default against Defendant Holman. 24 25 Plaintiff is correct that eight of the nine Defendants have been served and have appeared in this action. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on November 26, 2013, and the motion is pending. 26 27 28 1 On December 5, 2011, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. 1 1 Plaintiff is also correct that Defendant Holman has not appeared in this action. However, 2 contrary to Plaintiff’s contention, there is no evidence in the record that service has been effected on 3 Defendant Holman, which would trigger his legal obligation to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended 4 Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d), (e); Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). 5 6 Pursuant to the waiver of service returned on December 3, 2013, all Defendants except for Defendant Holman were served by mail on September 27, 2013, and waived service. Plaintiff’s motion is therefore premature absent evidence that Defendant Holman was served 7 8 and failed to respond. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default is HEREBY DENIED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 10 55(a). 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis December 17, 2013 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 3b142a 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?