Goolsby v. Cate et al

Filing 53

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 51 Motion to File Supplemental Opposition signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/29/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

THOMAS GOOLSBY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
CATE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:11cv01773 DLB PC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
OPPOSITION
(Document 51)

16

Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California

17
18

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in

19

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding

20
21

on First Amendment retaliation claims and due process claims against Defendants Holland,
Steadman, Gutierrez, Noyce, Tyree, Gentry, Eubanks, Medrano and Holman.

22

Defendants’ November 26, 2013, Motion to Dismiss is currently pending. Plaintiff

23

opposed the motion on January 6, 2014.
24

On January 10, 2014, the Court granted Defendants a 60 day extension of time to file a

25
26
27
28

reply.
On January 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to supplement his opposition, along with his
supplemental opposition. Plaintiff bases his request, in part, on newly available exhibits.
1

1

Defendants’ reply is not due until on or about March 5, 2014. Accordingly, because

2

Defendants will have a chance to address the supplement in their reply, Plaintiff’s motion is

3

GRANTED.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:

8

/s/ Dennis

January 29, 2014

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

9
10

L. Beck

9b0hied

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2