Goolsby v. Cate et al

Filing 86

ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Motion For Order Allowing PBSP To Make Copies Of Motion (Document 84 ), ORDER Directing Defendants To File Discovery Requests With Their Opposition, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/29/2014. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 THOMAS GOOLSBY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. GENTRY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11cv01773 LJO DLB PC ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PBSP TO MAKE COPIES OF MOTION (Document 84) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITH THEIR OPPOSITION 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on October 25, 2011. 21 In April 2014, the Court permitted Plaintiff to serve discovery related to his retaliation 22 23 24 25 claim. A general Discovery and Scheduling Order has not yet issued. On September 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an order allowing Pelican Bay State Prison law library staff to copy his motion to compel. Plaintiff states that pursuant to the 26 Court’s requirements related to the contents of a motion to compel, his motion is well over 100 27 pages. The law library, however, will only copy up to 100 pages. 28 1 1 2 3 4 The Court does not have jurisdiction to order prison officials to take any action, including copying Plaintiff’s legal documents. However, to assist Plaintiff in filing his motion to compel, the Court will relieve him of the obligation to copy the discovery requests and responses. Plaintiff therefore need only submit 5 his argument as to why he believes each response is deficient. 6 7 8 9 As the Court will need copies of the requests and responses to rule on the motion to compel, the Court ORDERS Defendants to provide the requests and responses at issue when they oppose Plaintiff’s motion to compel. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: /s/ Dennis September 29, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?