Goolsby v. Cate et al
Filing
86
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Motion For Order Allowing PBSP To Make Copies Of Motion (Document 84 ), ORDER Directing Defendants To File Discovery Requests With Their Opposition, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/29/2014. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
THOMAS GOOLSBY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
GENTRY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:11cv01773 LJO DLB PC
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PBSP
TO MAKE COPIES OF MOTION
(Document 84)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
FILE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITH
THEIR OPPOSITION
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action
on October 25, 2011.
21
In April 2014, the Court permitted Plaintiff to serve discovery related to his retaliation
22
23
24
25
claim. A general Discovery and Scheduling Order has not yet issued.
On September 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an order allowing Pelican Bay
State Prison law library staff to copy his motion to compel. Plaintiff states that pursuant to the
26
Court’s requirements related to the contents of a motion to compel, his motion is well over 100
27
pages. The law library, however, will only copy up to 100 pages.
28
1
1
2
3
4
The Court does not have jurisdiction to order prison officials to take any action, including
copying Plaintiff’s legal documents.
However, to assist Plaintiff in filing his motion to compel, the Court will relieve him of
the obligation to copy the discovery requests and responses. Plaintiff therefore need only submit
5
his argument as to why he believes each response is deficient.
6
7
8
9
As the Court will need copies of the requests and responses to rule on the motion to
compel, the Court ORDERS Defendants to provide the requests and responses at issue when they
oppose Plaintiff’s motion to compel.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
September 29, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?