Morales v. RB Fresno LLC et al

Filing 23

ORDER After Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/2/2012. (This Court ORDERS the parties, no later than 4/5/2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. This Court VACATES all pending dates and matters, including the March 8, 2012 scheduling conference.)(Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

JOHN MORALES,

10

CASE NO. CV F 11-1777 LJO DLB
Plaintiff,

vs.

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 22.)

11
RB FRESNO, LLC, et al.,
12
13

Defendants.
____________________________/

14

Plaintiff’s counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached. Pursuant to this Court’s

15

Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than April 5, 2012, to file appropriate papers

16

to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been

17

dismissed.

18
19

This Court VACATES all pending dates and matters, including the March 8, 2012 scheduling
conference.

20

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or

21

parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court

22

ADMONISHES counsel that they are expected to observe and comply with the Federal Rules of Civil

23

Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions and reinstatement of

24

discovery, motion and trial dates as this Court deems appropriate.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d

March 2, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE