Adler v. Gonzalez, et al.
Filing
47
ORDER granting 46 Motion to extend Dispositive Motion Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/14/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
BRENT ADLER,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
GONZALEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:11cv01803 AWI DLB PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE
MOTION DEADLINE
(Document 46)
17
18
19
Plaintiff Brent Adler (“Plaintiff”) is a former California state prisoner proceeding pro se
and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action is
20
proceeding on Plaintiff’s October 28, 2011, complaint against Defendants Gonzalez, Zanchi,
21
Peterson, Cannon, Wallace, Foster, Karlow, Stanford, Sampson and Snyder for denial of access
22
to the courts in violation of the First Amendment.
23
On August 13, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations
24
regarding Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants filed objections on September
25
12, 2014, and the Findings and Recommendations have been submitted to the District Court
26
Judge for review.
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
On October 13, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to extend the time for filing an
additional dispositive motion.
For GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion and extends the
date for filing an additional dispositive motion to sixty (60) days after the District Court’s order
5
on the Findings and Recommendations.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
October 14, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?