Adler v. Gonzalez, et al.

Filing 47

ORDER granting 46 Motion to extend Dispositive Motion Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/14/2014. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 BRENT ADLER, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11cv01803 AWI DLB PC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE (Document 46) 17 18 19 Plaintiff Brent Adler (“Plaintiff”) is a former California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action is 20 proceeding on Plaintiff’s October 28, 2011, complaint against Defendants Gonzalez, Zanchi, 21 Peterson, Cannon, Wallace, Foster, Karlow, Stanford, Sampson and Snyder for denial of access 22 to the courts in violation of the First Amendment. 23 On August 13, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations 24 regarding Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants filed objections on September 25 12, 2014, and the Findings and Recommendations have been submitted to the District Court 26 Judge for review. 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 On October 13, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to extend the time for filing an additional dispositive motion. For GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion and extends the date for filing an additional dispositive motion to sixty (60) days after the District Court’s order 5 on the Findings and Recommendations. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: /s/ Dennis October 14, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?