Batth et al v. Market 52, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER for APPEARANCE and EXAMINATION of JUDGMENT DEBTOR JERALD DANIEL DOWNS. Defendant/judgment debtor Jerald Daniel Downs shall appear personally on 7/17/2013, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/31/2013. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARANJIT BATTH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01806-AWI-SKO
ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AND
EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT
DEBTOR JERALD DANIEL DOWNS
v.
14
15
16
17
MARKET 52, INC., et al.,
(Docs. 29, 30)
Defendants.
_________________________________/
18
19
I.
INTRODUCTION
20
On December 15, 2011, Plaintiffs Charanjit Batth and Gagan Batth ("Plaintiffs") and
21
Defendants Market 52, Inc. ("Market 52") Jerald Daniel Downs ("J. Downs"), and Lyndsey C.
22
Downs ("L. Downs" or collectively "Defendants") filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order for
23
Entry of Judgment and Dissolution of Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. 20.) The Court approved
24
the parties' stipulation on December 16, 2011, and judgment was entered against Defendants
25
joint and severally in the total sum of $178,936.25. (Docs. 22, 23.)
26
On January 11, 2012, Plaintiffs requested issuance of an abstract of judgment against
27
Defendants, which was issued on January 12, 2012. (Doc. 24, 25.) On January 27, 2012,
28
Plaintiffs requested the issuance of a writ of execution. (Doc. 26.) On January 30, 2012, a
1
1
Notice of Stay of Proceedings was filed by Market 52, indicating that it had filed for bankruptcy.
2
(Doc. 27.) On January 31, 2012, the Court issued the writ of execution against Defendants
3
J. Downs and L. Downs, individually. (Doc. 28.)
4
On May 1, 2013, Plaintiffs filed applications and requests for an order for the appearance
5
and examination of judgment debtors J. Downs and L. Downs. (Docs. 29-31.) Accordingly,
6
J. Downs is ordered to appear personally on Wednesday, July 17, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. in
7
Courtroom 7 of the United States District Courthouse, located at 2500 Tulare Street,
8
Fresno, California, 93721, to furnish information to aid in enforcement of a money judgment by
9
answering questions about the Defendant/judgment debtor's real and person property.1
10
II.
DISCUSSION
11
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 governs enforcement of judgment proceedings in
12
federal courts. Hilao v. Estate of Marcos, 95 F.3d 848, 851 (9th Cir. 1996). Rule 69(a)
13
provides:
14
(1) Money Judgment; Applicable Procedure. A money judgment is enforced
by a writ of execution, unless the court directs otherwise. The procedure on
execution – and in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or
execution – must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is
located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies.
15
16
17
(2) Obtaining Discovery. In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment
creditor or a successor in interest whose interest appears of record may obtain
discovery from any person--including the judgment debtor--as provided in
these rules or by the procedure of the state where the court is located.
18
19
20
Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(1)-(2).
21
Judgment debtor proceedings under California law "permit the judgment creditor to
22
examine the judgment debtor, or third persons who have property of or are indebted to the
23
judgment debtor, in order to discover property and apply it toward the satisfaction of the money
24
judgment." Imperial Bank v. Pim Elec., Inc., 33 Cal. App. 4th 540, 546-47; see also Cal. Civ.
25
26
1
27
28
Plaintiffs had set the debtor examination hearing for Thursday, July 11, 2013; however, as Magistrate Judge Sheila
K. Oberto holds law and motion calendars on Wednesdays, the hearing is being reset to the following Wednesday,
July 17, 2013.
2
1
Proc. Code §§ 708.110-708.205. All assets of a judgment debtor are subject to enforcement.
2
Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 695.010 (a).
3
California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.110 provides in relevant part:
4
(a) The judgment creditor may apply to the proper court for an order requiring
the judgment debtor to appear before the court, or before a referee appointed by
the court, at a time and place specified in the order, to furnish information to aid
in enforcement of the money judgment.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(b) If the judgment creditor has not caused the judgment debtor to be examined
under this section during the preceding 120 days, the court shall make an order
upon ex parte application of the judgment creditor.
(c) If the judgment creditor has caused the judgment debtor to be examined under
this section during the preceding 120 days, the court shall make the order if the
judgment creditor by affidavit or otherwise shows good cause for the order. The
application shall be made on noticed motion if the court so directs or a court rule
so requires. Otherwise, it may be made ex parte.
(d) The judgment creditor shall personally serve a copy of the order on the
judgment debtor not less than 10 days before the date set for examination.
Service shall be made in the manner specified in Section 145.10. Service of the
order creates a lien on the personal property of the judgment debtor for a period of
one year from the date of the order unless extended or sooner terminated by the
court.
(e) The order shall contain the following statement in 14-point boldface type if
printed or in capital letters if typed: "NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR. If
you fail to appear at the time and place specified in this order, you may be subject
to arrest and punishment for contempt of court and the court may make an order
requiring you to pay the reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the judgment
creditor in this proceeding."
18
19
Cal Civ. Proc. Code § 708.110(a)-(e).
20
California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.160(a) also provides that "[e]xcept as otherwise
21
provided in this section, the proper court for examination of a person under this article is the
22
court in which the money judgment is entered." Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 708.160(a). Here,
23
judgment was entered by this Court on December 16, 2011. (Docs. 22, 23.)
24
As such, Plaintiffs' application sets forth the showing required by Federal Rule of Civil
25
Procedure 69(a)(2) and the applicable provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure
26
§§ 708.110 and 708.160.
27
28
3
1
III.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
Defendant/judgment debtor Jerald Daniel Downs shall appear personally on
4
Wednesday, July 17, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 of the United States
5
District Courthouse, located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721,
6
to furnish information to aid in enforcement of a money judgment by answering
7
questions about the Defendant/ judgment debtor's real and person property;
8
2.
Plaintiffs/judgment creditors must serve this order upon Defendant/judgment
9
debtor Jerald Daniel Downs personally not less than ten (10) days before the
10
date set for the examination and must file a certificate of such service with
11
the Court; and
12
3.
If Plaintiffs/judgment creditors are unable to effectuate personal service on
13
Defendant/judgment debtor Jerald Daniel Downs within the required time,
14
Plaintiffs/judgment creditors must file notice with the Court by no later than
15
nine (9) days before the date set for the examination and inform the Court that the
16
examination hearing must be taken off calendar.
17
NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT
18
THE TIME AND PLACE SPECIFIED IN THIS ORDER, YOU MAY BE
19
SUBJECT TO ARREST AND PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF
20
COURT AND THE COURT MAY MAKE AN ORDER REQUIRING YOU
21
TO PAY THE REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES INCURRED BY THE
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
27
28
4
1
JUDGMENT CREDITOR IN THIS PROCEEDING.2
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
5
May 31, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
ie14hje
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
This notice is furnished pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.110(e).
28
5
ure-END:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?