Perez v. Adams et al

Filing 82

ORDER Dismissing with Prejudice, Defendants Byrum, Huback, Latraille, Pimentel and Taber Pursuant to Parties' Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/11/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
13

MARCO PEREZ,

14
v.

15
16

R. HUBACH, et al.,

17

No. 1:11-cv-01820 BAM (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING, WITH
PREJUDICE, DEFENDANTS BYRUM,
HUBACK, LATRAILLE, PIMENTEL
AND TABER PURSUANT TO PARTIES’
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF ACTION
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
Defendants.

18

Action Filed: November 1, 2011

19
20
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Marco Perez and

21
22

Defendants Byrum, Hubach, LaTraille, Pimentel, and Taber, by and through his counsel of

23

record, stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3
4
Dated: March 24, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

5

7

XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

8

/s/ Joseph Wheeler

9

DIANA ESQUIVEL
JOSEPH WHEELER
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants

6

10
11
12

Dated: March 24, 2017

/s/ Marco Perez
Marco Perez
Plaintiff Pro se

13
14

SA2014117394
32810010.doc

15
16
17
ORDER

18
19
20

Based on the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the
Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and to close this case.

21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

April 11, 2017

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2