Lawrie v. Allison et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 2 , 6 , 9 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/4/2012. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

MATTHEW ALAN LAWRIE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

1:11-cv-01821 GSA PC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND
DIRECTING CLERK TO RETURN
DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Plaintiff has
consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
On December 8, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause, requiring Plaintiff to

20

show cause why his applications, to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied based on

21

Plaintiff’s showing that he is able to afford to pay the filing fee for this action.1 On December

22

14, 2011, Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause, confirming that he owns at least

23

one investment account and asserting that his request for access to the funds was denied by

24

Merrill Lynch. Plaintiff also refers to a securities fraud case #11c0347 without further

25
26
27
28

1

Plaintiff filed two applications to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, on November
1,2011 and November 10, 2011. Examination of Plaintiff’s applications reveals that Plaintiff is able to afford the
costs of this action. Specifically, Plaintiff declares under penalty of perjury that he has more than one million dollars
in cash (which includes the balance of checking or savings accounts), two IRA accounts, stocks, bonds, securities,
other financial instruments, and other valuable assetes.

1
2

explanation. Plaintiff states that he has no funds in his prison trust account.
On December 15, 2011, an order was entered, directing Plaintiff to provide further

3

evidence to the Court about his bank and investment accounts outside the prison, in support of

4

his application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was specifically directed to file a written

5

declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, informing the Court of each financial account he

6

owns, identified by bank or other holder and account number, the approximate balance in each

7

account, his efforts to gain access to the funds in the accounts, and the reasons he was denied

8

access. Plaintiff was also directed to further explain his references to the securities fraud case

9

#11c0347 and his relationship to the case.

10

On December 20, 2011, the Court received Plaintiff’s response to the order. Plaintiff’s

11

submission consists of a declaration and exhibits numbered 1 through 350.2 It appears that

12

Plaintiff received a financial settlement from his father’s estate, but the funds have been depleted

13

due to settlement of estate taxes and child support. Although unclear from his statement and

14

earlier submissions, it appears that Plaintiff is contesting the validity of his child support

15

obligations. That question is not before this Court. The only specific information regarding

16

financial accounts submitted by Plaintiff, indicating that funds are in an account under Plaintiff’s

17

name, are dated 2003. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s declaration and exhibits and finds that

18

Plaintiff has not come forward with any evidence that he currently has access to any financial

19

accounts that would enable him to pay the filing fee for this action.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk’s Office is

22
23
24

directed to process Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis.
2. The Clerk’s Office is directed to return to Plaintiff the documents received by the
Court on December 20, 2011.

25
26
27
28

2

Plaintiff also submitted a prison identification card dated April 21, 2011, and issued in Plaintiff’s name.
The Court will return the card to Plaintiff along with the rest of the documents submitted on December 20, 2011.

2

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
6i0kij

January 4, 2012

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3