Lawrie v. Allison et al

Filing 14

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/26/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MATTHEW ALAN LAWRIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:11 cv 01821 GSA PC ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(c)(1). 20 By order filed September 20, 2012, the operative complaint was dismissed for failure to 21 state a claim. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint, and directed to do so 22 within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 23 In the September 20, 2012, order the Court informed Plaintiff of the deficiencies in his 24 complaint, and dismissed the complaint on the ground that Plaintiff had failed to state a claim 25 upon which relief could be granted. Because Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, the 26 Court dismisses the claims made in the original complaint with prejudice for failure to state a 27 federal claim upon which the court could grant relief. See Noll v. Carlson, 809 F. 2d 1446, 1448 28 (9th Cir. 1987) (prisoner must be given notice of deficiencies and opportunity to amend prior to 1 2 3 dismissing for failure to state a claim). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij October 26, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?