Taylor et al v. The People of the State of Alabama et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO UNSEAL CASE signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/14/2016. CASE UNSEALED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 KIRELL F. TAYLOR, et al., 5 6 7 8 Plaintiffs ORDER UNSEALING CASE v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants 9 10 CASE NO. 1:11-CV-1847 AWI DLB This case was filed as a qui tam action by Plaintiff on behalf the United States under to the 11 False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq), alleging underpayment of federal income taxes by 12 individual taxpayers. Doc. 1. Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2), the complaint was filed under 13 seal. Plaintiff was seeking to proceed in forma pauperis. In reviewing the application, the court 14 determined that there was no subject matter jurisdiction. Docs. 8 and 10. The United States did 15 not take part in this case. There is no reason for the records in this case to remain sealed. See 16 United States ex rel. Lee v. Horizon West, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97310, *6 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 17 6, 2006) (“other courts faced with this issue have considered lifting the seal on the entire record to 18 be appropriate unless the Government shows that such disclosure would: (1) reveal confidential 19 investigative methods or techniques; (2) jeopardize an ongoing investigation; or (3) harm non- 20 parties”); cf. United States v. Creekside Hospice II, LLC, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173556, *11 (D. 21 Nev. 2015) (“courts routinely unseal the dockets of qui tam actions once litigation is under way. 22 There is a strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial proceeding”). 23 24 The Clerk of the Court is directed to UNSEAL all documents in this case. The case remains closed. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2016 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?