Bergman et al v. Tobin et al
Filing
58
ORDER on Reconsideration Request and to Permit Defense Reply signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/26/2012. Response due by 12/4/2012.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEIF BERGMAN, et al.,
CASE NO. CV F 11-1866 LJO GSA
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION REQUEST
AND TO PERMIT DEFENSE REPLY
(Doc. 57.)
13
vs.
14
MICHAEL P. TOBIN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
18
On November 21, 2012, defendants Michael P. Tobin and Holly W. Tobin (collectively the
19
“Tobins”) filed their request to reconsider (doc. 57) the Findings and Recommendations Denying Motion
20
to Expunge Lis Pendens (doc. 56). This Court construes the Tobins’ reconsideration request as
21
objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which provides in pertinent part:
22
23
24
Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written
objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court.
A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report
or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge
of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.
25
26
This Court will conduct a de novo review of the findings and recommendations, pursuant to 28
27
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and thus will not treat the Tobin’s reconsideration request as proceeding under Local
28
Rule 303(c), which employs the standard of review of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). No later than
1
1
December 4, 2012, the other parties may file a response to the Tobins’ reconsideration request.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d
November 26, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?