Dasenbrock v. Kings County et al

Filing 190

ORDER regarding 185 Motion to Compel and 189 Motion to Disregard signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/29/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 ROBIN DASENBROOK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. A. ENENMOH, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:11-cv-01884 DAD DLB PC ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION TO DISREGARD [ECF Nos. 185, 189] 16 Plaintiff Robin Dasenbrook (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding 19 against Defendants Enenmoh, Page, Perez, and Adair for claims of negligence and deliberate 20 indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 21 22 23 24 On July 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel the office of the Director of Nursing at CSATF, Corcoran State Prison, to produce documents listed within the Court’s subpoena duces tecum. On July 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court disregard his motion to compel in light of the Director of Nursing’s compliance on July 13, 2016. Good cause 25 26 27 28 having been presented, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY /// /// 1 1 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to disregard is GRANTED, and the motion to compel is 2 DISREGARDED. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis July 29, 2016 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?