Dasenbrock v. Kings County et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/20/2013 denying Motion for Extension of Time as moot re 30 , 35 . (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

ROBIN DASENBROCK,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 1:11-cv-01884-AWI-DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT

v.
ORDER RE STATUS
KINGS COUNTY, et al.,

15

(ECF Nos. 30 & 35)
Defendants.

16

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

17 1983.

On October 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to sumbit his initial

18 disclosure. (ECF No. 30.) On November 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a status
19 update. (ECF No. 35.) The Court’s previous discovery and scheduling order outlined Plaintiff’s
20 disclosure obligations to defendants.

(ECF No. 24.)

Plaintiff was required to file initial

21 disclosures with defendants, not with the court, and Plaintiff is cautioned that discovery
22 documents sent to the court will be returned. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b).
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time is

1

2 DENIED as MOOT.
3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated:

/s/ Dennis

November 20, 2013

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

9 427h8ijefekbei
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2