Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 31

ORDER REMANDING CASE to the Social Security Administration for Further Consideration, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/15/15: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANNA MARIE PHILLIPS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. 18 19 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 17 Case No. 1:11-cv-01928-EPG On November 18, 2011, Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On November 20, 20 21 22 23 2012, this Court issued an order and judgment affirming the Commissioner’s decision. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) Plaintiff timely filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 23.) On 24 August 18, 2015, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a Memorandum vacating the 25 judgment of this Court with instructions that the case be remanded to the Social Security 26 Administration for further consideration. (ECF No. 27.) A mandate was issued on October 14, 27 2015. (ECF No. 30.) 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1) This case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration to complete an 3 analysis of: (a) evidence of Plaintiff’s addiction to prescription drugs; and (b) the 4 opinion of treating physician Dr. Dumitru, consistent with the instructions outlined in 5 the Memorandum issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on August 18, 2015. 6 (ECF No. 27); and, 7 8 2) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: October 15, 2015 /s/ Erica P. Grosjean 12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?