Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
43
ORDER Lifting Stay on Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/23/2016. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney at Law: 119433
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Anna Marie Phillips
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
10
11
ANNA MARIE PHILLIPS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant
17
18
19
) Case No.: 1:11-cv-01928-EPG
)
) STIPULATION TO LIFT STAY;
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
TO THE HONORABLE ERICA P. GROSJEAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OF THE DISTRICT COURT:
20
The parties hereby stipulate to lift the stay on the motion for attorney fees
21
under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Ninth Circuit granted the motion for
22
///
23
24
25
26
-1-
1
fees for time expended before that Court. This Court can now decide the issue of
2
fees for work done before it.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATE: March 11, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
4
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
5
/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing
BY: _________________________
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney for plaintiff ANNA MARIE PHILLIPS
6
7
8
9
Date: March 14, 2016
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
10
BY: /s/ Lynn M. Harada
LYNN M. HARADA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
Based on the above stipulation, the Court lifts the stay on Plaintiff’s Motion
16
for Attorney Fees and Expenses (ECF No. 32). Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the
17
Motion is deemed submitted.
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 23, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?