Gabrielson et al v. Hernandez et al

Filing 25

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/10/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HANNO T. POWELL 131154 POWELL & POOL, LLP 7522 N. Colonial Avenue, Ste. 100 Fresno, California 93711 Telephone: (559) 228-8034 Facsimile: (559) 228-6818 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PAUL GABRIELSON and MARY GABRIELSON 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 POWELL & POOL, LLP 7522 N. Colonial Avenue, Suite 100 Fresno, California 93711 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 11 PAUL GABRIELSON and MARY GABRIELSON 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 vs. MARISA HERNANDEZ, ALSO KNOWN AS MARISA DUARTE; ALAN T. BERTA; CINDY BERTA; SARAH ASHLEY BERTA; ALLIANCE TITLE COMPANY, ENTITY UNKNOWN AS TRUSTEE FOR BENEFICIARIES JAMES DEE JOLLY AND VELMA M. JOLLY; JAMES DEE JOLLY; VELMA M. JOLLY; THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT ADVERSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ TITLE THERETO ; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 25, inclusive Defendants. 23 Case No. 1:11-CV-1942-MJS ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO ORAL STIPULATION [No Hearing Requested] 24 The court having received the Request For Order Dismissing Action Pursuant to oral 25 Stipulation filed on behalf of Plaintiffs PAUL and MARY GABRIELSON, and good cause 26 appearing: 27 /// 28 /// -1ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO ORAL STIPULATION 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 2 1. The above-referenced action is hereby dismissed in its entirety; and 3 2. All Parties shall bear its or their own costs. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 10, 2014 /s/ 7 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 8 ci4d6 POWELL & POOL, LLP 7522 N. Colonial Avenue, Suite 100 Fresno, California 93711 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO ORAL STIPULATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?