Gabrielson et al v. Hernandez et al
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/10/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
HANNO T. POWELL 131154
POWELL & POOL, LLP
7522 N. Colonial Avenue, Ste. 100
Fresno, California 93711
Telephone:
(559) 228-8034
Facsimile:
(559) 228-6818
Attorneys for Plaintiffs PAUL GABRIELSON
and MARY GABRIELSON
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
POWELL & POOL, LLP
7522 N. Colonial Avenue, Suite 100
Fresno, California 93711
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
11
PAUL GABRIELSON and MARY
GABRIELSON
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
vs.
MARISA HERNANDEZ, ALSO
KNOWN AS MARISA DUARTE; ALAN
T. BERTA; CINDY BERTA; SARAH
ASHLEY BERTA; ALLIANCE TITLE
COMPANY, ENTITY UNKNOWN AS
TRUSTEE FOR BENEFICIARIES
JAMES DEE JOLLY AND VELMA M.
JOLLY; JAMES DEE JOLLY; VELMA
M. JOLLY; THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA; THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA; ALL PERSONS
UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN
INTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT
ADVERSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ TITLE
THERETO ; AND DOES 1 THROUGH
25, inclusive
Defendants.
23
Case No. 1:11-CV-1942-MJS
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
PURSUANT TO ORAL STIPULATION
[No Hearing Requested]
24
The court having received the Request For Order Dismissing Action Pursuant to oral
25
Stipulation filed on behalf of Plaintiffs PAUL and MARY GABRIELSON, and good cause
26
appearing:
27
///
28
///
-1ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO ORAL STIPULATION
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
2
1. The above-referenced action is hereby dismissed in its entirety; and
3
2. All Parties shall bear its or their own costs.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 10, 2014
/s/
7
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
8
ci4d6
POWELL & POOL, LLP
7522 N. Colonial Avenue, Suite 100
Fresno, California 93711
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO ORAL STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?