Transamerican Life Insurance Company v. Shubin, et al.
Filing
46
ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause 42 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/23/2012. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
TRANSAMERICA
COMPANY,
7
8
9
LIFE
INSURANCE
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01958-LJO-SKO
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
v.
GARY SHUBIN, et al.,
10
(Docket No. 42)
Defendants.
/
11
12
On August 6, 2012, the Court issued an order adopting the findings and recommendations
13
of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff Transamerica Life Insurance Company's ("Plaintiff") motion
14
for discharge and award of attorney's fees be granted, and further ordered Plaintiff to provide the
15
Court with an accounting of the deferred life insurance annuity payable on behalf of
16
Annuitant/Owner Jeri Wood-Shubin ("Annuity") and with the mailing addresses for Defendants Gary
17
Shubin and James Shubin. Plaintiff failed to provide the requested information in the time required
18
by the Court's Order, and on August 30, 2012, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring
19
Plaintiff, within seven (7) days of the date of that Order, to either file the required information or
20
show cause as to why the information was not timely filed. (Doc. 42.)
21
On September 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a "Response to Order to Show Cause or File
22
Requested Information" and the Declaration of Tracy Martin, a Director of Post Operations
23
employed by Plaintiff. (Docs. 44, 45.) Plaintiff's response included the mailing addresses for Gary
24
Shubin and James Shubin, and the Martin Declaration provides an accounting of the distribution of
25
the Annuity.1
26
27
28
1
In providing an accounting of the distribution of the Annuity, the Martin Declaration indicates that Plaintiff
committed an "oversight" and "failed to deduct" from the Annuity the amount authorized by the Court for attorney's fees.
(Doc. 45, Martin Decl., ΒΆ 5.) Plaintiff, however, does not request any relief regarding this purported oversight. (See
Docs. 44, 45.)
1
Plaintiff's response, filed on September 13, 2012, was not filed within the time period set
2
forth in the Court's August 30, 2012, Order to Show Cause, which required a response within seven
3
(7) days. However, as Plaintiff has finally provided the Court with the requested information, the
4
Court will DISCHARGE the Order to Show Cause.
5
Plaintiff's counsel, however, is reminded that the Local Rules of the United States District
6
Court, Eastern District of California, Rule 110, provides that the "[f]ailure of counsel or of a party
7
to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the
8
Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the
9
Court." The Court is aware that in meeting deadlines, events sometimes conspire against even the
10
most conscientious, experienced, and diligent practitioners. Nevertheless, chronic and habitual late
11
filings cause the Court to expend an inordinate amount of judicial resources. This extends beyond
12
mere inconvenience and impacts other litigants and cases that are kept on hold.
13
Plaintiff's counsel failed to comply with the August 6, 2012, Court Order requiring that
14
Plaintiff provide an accounting of the Annuity and the mailing addresses of Defendants Gary Shubin
15
and James Shubin, and then failed to timely comply with the Court's August 30, 2012, Order to
16
Show Cause. (See Docs. 39, 42.) Plaintiff's counsel is cautioned that such conduct will no longer
17
be tolerated and may subject counsel to sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 110.
18
19
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's August 30, 2012, Order
to Show Cause (Doc. 42) is DISCHARGED.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated:
ie14hj
September 23, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?