Bryant v. Biter et al
Filing
3
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Pay $350.00 Filing Fee in full within Thirty Days or Action will be Dismissed signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 06/27/2012. Filing Fee Deadline: 7/31/2012. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KEVIN D. BRYANT,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-1975-AWI-MJS (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
v.
MARTIN D. BITER, et al.,
(ECF No. 2)
Defendants.
13
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY
$350.00 FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS OR ACTION WILL BE
DISMISSED
14
/
15
16
Plaintiff Kevin D. Bryant (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
17
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
Plaintiff is currently detained at Kern Valley State Prison. On November 30, 2011,
19
Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF
20
No. 2.)
21
28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. Section 1915(g) provides
22
that “[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner
23
has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an
24
action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it
25
is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the
26
prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” A review of the actions filed
27
by Plaintiff reveals that Plaintiff is subject to section 1915(g) and is precluded from
28
1
1
proceeding in forma pauperis unless Plaintiff was, at the time the Complaint was filed, under
2
imminent danger of serious physical injury.1
3
Plaintiff’s Complaint does not set forth the statutory basis for his claims. It appears
4
that he wishes to bring a First Amendment freedom of religion action. Plaintiff alleges that
5
he is Jewish and requires kosher meals, but his requests for kosher meals are repeatedly
6
denied.
7
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint and finds that Plaintiff does not meet
8
the imminent danger exception. Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir.
9
2007). While the Court should not delve into an overly detailed analysis of Plaintiff’s claims
10
in determining whether the exception is met, Plaintiff must set forth plausible allegations
11
that, at the time of filing, he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
12
Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1055.
13
Here, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s allegations do not meet the imminent danger
14
exception. There is no suggestion in the Complaint that at the time Plaintiff filed his
15
Complaint, he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury arising from his inability
16
to procure kosher meals. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma
17
pauperis shall be denied.
18
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:
19
1.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma
pauperis in this action is denied;
20
2.
21
Plaintiff is directed to submit the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30)
days; and
22
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
1
The Court takes judicial notice of the following cases: Bryant v. Pacheco, et al.,
5:09-cv-01306-UA-FMO (C.D. Cal.)(dism issed on 07/23/2009 as frivolous and for failure to state a claim );
Bryant v. Briones-Colm an, et al., 5:09-cv-01460-UA-FMO (C.D. Cal.)(dism issed on 08/17/2009 as
frivolous and for failure to state a claim ); and Bryant v. Hanks, et al., 2:10-cv-03199-UA-FMO (C.D.
Cal.)(dism issed on 05/07/2010 for failure to state a claim ).
2
3.
1
If Plaintiff fails to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days, this
action will be dismissed, without prejudice.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
ci4d6
June 27, 2012
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?