Nastrom et al v. New Century Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 18

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Failure to Obey Order, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/24/2012. Show Cause Response due by 3/3/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

JAMEY L. NASTROM, et al.,

10
11
12

CASE NO. CV F 11-1998 LJO DLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO
OBEY ORDER
(Doc. 15.)

vs.
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE
CORPORATION, et al.,

13
Defendant.
14

/

15

This Court’s February 14, 2012 order required each plaintiff, no later than February 22, 2012,

16

to file papers to indicate whether each plaintiff consents to the conduct of further proceedings by a U.S.

17

Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Kim Hewton-Nastrom has disobeyed the February 14, 2012 order. This

18

Court’s Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with an order of this Court “may be grounds

19

for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent

20

power of the Court.”

21

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS plaintiff Kim Hewton-Nastrom, no later than March 3, 2012,

22

to file papers to show cause why sanctions, including dismissal of her claims with or without prejudice,

23

should not be imposed for failure to comply with the February 14, 2012 order. This order to show cause

24

will be discharged if, no later than March 3, 2012, plaintiff Kim Hewton-Nastrom files papers to indicate

25

whether she consents to the conduct of all further proceedings by a U.S. Magistrate Judge or papers to

26

dismiss her claims.

27

This Court ADMONISHES the parties that they are required to observe and comply with the

28

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions
1

1

as this Court deems appropriate.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d

February 24, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2