Nastrom et al v. New Century Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 29

ORDER Denying 28 Request To File Electronically, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/4/2012. (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMEY L. NASTROM; KIM M. HEWTON-NASTROM, 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 11 NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11cv01998 DLB ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY (Document 28) 14 Plaintiffs Jamey L. Nastrom and Kim M. Hewton-Nastrom (“Plaintiffs”), appearing pro 15 se, filed this action on November 22, 2011. On March 29, 2012, Plaintiffs submitted a request to 16 file all documents via fax. Doc. 28. Plaintiffs’ request is DENIED. 17 The United States District Court, Eastern District of California is an electronic case 18 management/filing district. Local Rule 133(a). All pro se parties must file and serve paper 19 documents as required by applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or by Local Rules, except 20 with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge. Local Rule 133(b)(2). After a 21 pro se party files a paper document, the Clerk transforms the paper filing into an electronic 22 record and ultimately discards the paper filing. Local Rule 133(a). The Local Rules do not 23 permit documents to be transmitted via fax directly to the Clerk or to the Court. Local Rule 24 133(e)(4). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: 27 3b142a April 4, 2012 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?