Nastrom et al v. New Century Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
29
ORDER Denying 28 Request To File Electronically, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/4/2012. (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JAMEY L. NASTROM;
KIM M. HEWTON-NASTROM,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
v.
10
11
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE
CORPORATION, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:11cv01998 DLB
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE
ELECTRONICALLY
(Document 28)
14
Plaintiffs Jamey L. Nastrom and Kim M. Hewton-Nastrom (“Plaintiffs”), appearing pro
15
se, filed this action on November 22, 2011. On March 29, 2012, Plaintiffs submitted a request to
16
file all documents via fax. Doc. 28. Plaintiffs’ request is DENIED.
17
The United States District Court, Eastern District of California is an electronic case
18
management/filing district. Local Rule 133(a). All pro se parties must file and serve paper
19
documents as required by applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or by Local Rules, except
20
with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge. Local Rule 133(b)(2). After a
21
pro se party files a paper document, the Clerk transforms the paper filing into an electronic
22
record and ultimately discards the paper filing. Local Rule 133(a). The Local Rules do not
23
permit documents to be transmitted via fax directly to the Clerk or to the Court. Local Rule
24
133(e)(4).
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
27
3b142a
April 4, 2012
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?