Nastrom et al v. New Century Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Denial of 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/7/2011. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill. (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JAMEY L. NASTROM; KIM M.
HEWTON-NASTROM,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
10
Plaintiffs,
11
v.
12
13
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE,
CORPORATION, et al.,
14
15
Defendants.
1:11cv01998 LJO DLB
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DENIAL OF APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(Document 2)
)
16
17
Plaintiffs Jamey L. Nastrom and Kim M. Hewton-Nastrom (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro
18
se, filed this action on November 22, 2011, along with an application to proceed in forma
19
pauperis.
20
I.
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
21
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) provides that any court of the United States may authorize
22
the commencement, prosecution of defense of any civil or criminal suit, action, proceeding, or
23
any appeal therein, without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an
24
affidavit that includes a statement of all assets the person possesses and that the person is unable
25
to pay such fees or give security therefor.
26
It has been held that “one need not be absolutely destitute to obtain benefits of the in
27
forma pauperis statute.” Jefferson v. U.S.A., 277 F.2d 723, 724 (9th Cir.1960). Yet, a “showing
28
of something more than mere hardship must be made.” Martin v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 221
1
1
F.Supp. 757, 759 (W.D.La.1963). And wherever upon the spectrum a complainant may fall, “it
2
is proper and indeed essential for the supporting affidavits to state the facts as to affiant’s poverty
3
with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.” Jefferson, 277 F.2d at 725.
4
In the application, Plaintiff Jamey L. Nastrom states that he is employed at Sutter Central
5
Valley Hospitals (Memorial Hospital) in Modesto, California and at the County of San Joaquin
6
Auditor-Controller in Stockton, California. According to the affidavit, he earns approximately
7
$46,000 gross income per year from the two jobs. He owns a home valued at $52,000, four
8
vehicles, two ATVs and two flat bed trailers. He has two monthly mortgage payments totaling
9
over $1,800.00 and debts totaling $78,274.08. He supports his son and daughter. In addition to
10
ordinary expenses, such as utilities and insurance, he has listed expenses that include
11
cosmetics/haircuts and tobacco products. Based on the affidavit, the Court finds that Plaintiff has
12
not demonstrated that he is unable to pay or guarantee costs without sacrificing the necessities of
13
life.1 Accordingly, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma
14
pauperis be denied and that Plaintiffs be ordered to pay the $350.00 filing fee.
15
II.
16
Pending Bankruptcy
In the application to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff Jamey L. Nastrom states that
17
there is a pending bankruptcy case, numbered 11-98377. Plaintiff has failed to provide the Court
18
with any information concerning the nature and status of the bankruptcy proceeding.
19
Accordingly, the Court requests that Plaintiffs provide a statement on the status of the bankruptcy
20
proceedings within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. The statement should include the
21
following:
22
(1) the type of bankruptcy filing, e.g., Chapter 7;
23
(2) the date of filing;
24
(3) any pending or forthcoming stays;
25
26
27
28
1
The affidavit in support of the application is signed by Plaintiff Jamey L. Nastrom. Plaintiff Kim M.
Hewton-Nastrom has not submitted an application or a signed affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. According to
documents attached to the complaint, Plaintiffs Jamey L. Nastrom and Kim M. Hewton-Nastrom are husband and
wife. The Court’s finding that Plaintiff Jamey L. Nastrom is able to pay or guarantee costs without sacrificing the
necessities of life also would apply to his wife.
2
1
(4) if there is a trustee administering the estate; and
2
(5) if the causes of action asserted in this case (or the underlying real property) are listed
3
or will be listed as an asset of the estate.
4
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5
For the reasons stated, Plaintiffs are HEREBY ORDERED to provide a statement
6
regarding the status of pending bankruptcy case numbered 11-98377 within thirty (30) days of
7
the date of this order.
8
The Court also HEREBY RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s application be DENIED and
9
that Plaintiff be ORDERED to pay the $350.00 filing fee. This Findings and Recommendation
10
will be submitted to the Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28
11
U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and
12
Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be
13
captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is
14
advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the
15
District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a
December 7, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?