Nastrom et al v. New Century Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 7

ORDER Adopting 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding DENIAL of Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/11/2012. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JAMEY L. NASTROM; KIM M. HEWTON-NASTROM, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11cv01998 LJO DLB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DENIAL OF APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Document 5) 16 Plaintiffs Jamey L. Nastrom and Kim M. Hewton-Nastrom (“Plaintiffs”), appearing pro 17 se, filed the instant action on November 22, 2011, along with an application to proceed in forma 18 pauperis. 19 On December 7, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 20 Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. The Findings and 21 Recommendations were served on Plaintiffs and contained notice that any objections were to be 22 filed within thirty (30) days. On January 5, 2012, Plaintiffs filed objections. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a 24 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 25 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 26 27 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations issued December 7, 2011, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and 5 3. Plaintiffs SHALL pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action within thirty (30) days 6 of the date of this order. 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: 66h44d January 11, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?