Hall et al v. Mims et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER Continuing Mandatory Scheduling Conference: last day for Defendants to file a responsive pleading is 4/10/2012 (NOTE: document had a typo with date of 4/10/2010). Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 2/29/12 to Monday, May 7, 2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/21/2012. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

KEVIN B. BRIGGS
County Counsel
MICHAEL R. LINDEN
Deputy County Counsel – State Bar No. 192485
2220 Tulare Street, Ste. 500
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
MARGARET MIMS, et al.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

QUENTIN HALL, SHAWN GONZALEZ,
SHARON CHAVEZ, ROBERT
MERRYMAN, DAWN SINGH, CARLTON
FIELDS, and BRIAN MURPHY, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly
situated,

Case No. 1:11-cv-02047 LJO BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiffs,
v.
MARGARET MIMS, Sheriff, Fresno
County; EDWARD MORENO, M.D.,
Director, Fresno County Department of
Public Health; GEORGE LAIRD, Ph.D.,
Division Manager, Division of
Correctional Health, Fresno County
Department of Public Health; PRATAP
NARAYEN, M.D., Medical Director,
Division of Correctional Health, Fresno
County Department of Public Health;
RICK HILL, Captain of Detention, Fresno
County Sheriff’s Office; MARILYNN
WELDON, Captain of Inmate Programs
and Contracts, Fresno County Sheriff’s
Office,
Defendants.

27
28
Stipulation and Order Continuing
Mandatory Scheduling Conference

1

Case No. 1:11-cv-02047-LJO-BAM

1

Defendants MARGARET MIMS, et al. (hereinafter “Defendants”), specially-

2

appearing for the limited purpose of this stipulation, and plaintiffs QUENTIN HALL, et al.

3

(hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), respectfully submit this Stipulation to continue the Mandatory

4

Scheduling Conference in the above-entitled action.

5

WHEREAS, on December 13, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their initial complaint in this

6

Court. At this time, the Court set the Mandatory Scheduling Conference for February

7

29, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 8, the Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe presiding.

8

However, this complaint was never served on Defendants.

9
10

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2012, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint
(“FAC”).

11

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2012, Plaintiffs’ counsel sent, via Federal Express

12

delivery, waiver of service of summons documents to Defendants’ counsel, pursuant to

13

Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On February 15, 2012, Defendants’

14

executed the waiver forms on behalf of the defendants, and sent the forms to Plaintiffs’

15

counsel via regular mail.

16
17

WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
last day for Defendants to file a responsive pleading is April 10, 2010.

18

THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their counsel, hereby

19

stipulate that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference be continued to May 7, 2012, at

20

9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 8, the Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe presiding.

21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22

Dated: February 17, 2012
KEVIN B. BRIGGS
County Counsel

23
24
By:

25
26
27

/s/ Michael Linden
Michael R. Linden, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendants
MARGARET MIMS, et al.

28
Stipulation and Order Continuing
Mandatory Scheduling Conference

2

Case No. 1:11-cv-02047-LJO-BAM

1

Dated: February 17, 2012
COOLEY LLP

2
3
By:

4
5

/s/ Maureen Alger
Maureen P. Alger
Attorney for Plaintiffs

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated:

February 21, 2012

11

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order Continuing
Mandatory Scheduling Conference

3

Case No. 1:11-cv-02047-LJO-BAM