Hall et al v. Mims et al
Filing
42
STIPULATION and ORDER Modifying Preliminary Scheduling Order to Set Last Day to Serve Initial Disclosures: by 7/31/2012. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/11/2012. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KEVIN B. BRIGGS
County Counsel
MICHAEL R. LINDEN
Deputy County Counsel – State Bar No. 192485
2220 Tulare Street, Ste. 500
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: (559) 600-3479
Facsimile: (559) 600-3480
Attorneys for Defendants
MARGARET MIMS, et al.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
QUENTIN HALL, SHAWN GONZALEZ,
SHARON CHAVEZ, ROBERT
MERRYMAN, DAWN SINGH, CARLTON
FIELDS, and BRIAN MURPHY, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER
MODIFYING PRELIMINARY
SCHEDULING ORDER TO SET LAST
DAY TO SERVE INITIAL
DISCLOSURES
v.
17
Case No. 1:11-cv-02047 LJO BAM
MARGARET MIMS, Sheriff, Fresno
County; EDWARD MORENO, M.D.,
Director, Fresno County Department of
Public Health; GEORGE LAIRD, Ph.D.,
Division Manager, Division of
Correctional Health, Fresno County
Department of Public Health; PRATAP
NARAYEN, M.D., Medical Director,
Division of Correctional Health, Fresno
County Department of Public Health;
RICK HILL, Captain of Detention, Fresno
County Sheriff’s Office; MARILYNN
WELDON, Captain of Inmate Programs
and Contracts, Fresno County Sheriff’s
Office,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Defendants.
27
28
1
Stipulation and Order Modifying
Preliminary Scheduling Order
Case No. 1:11-cv-02047-LJO-BAM
1
Defendants MARGARET MIMS, et al. (hereinafter “Defendants”), and plaintiffs
2
QUENTIN HALL, et al. (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), through their respective counsel of
3
record, respectfully submit this Stipulation to modify the existing Preliminary Scheduling
4
Order to set a last day to serve Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) of the
5
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2012, the Court conducted a mandatory scheduling
conference.
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the Court issued its Preliminary Scheduling Order,
which did not include a date for the service of Initial Disclosures.
10
THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their counsel, hereby
11
stipulate that the last day for the parties to serve their Initial Disclosures is July 31,
12
2012. No further extensions of time for the service of the parties’ Initial Disclosures will
13
be granted. However, this stipulation and order does not affect the ability of the parties
14
to make supplemental disclosures, pursuant to Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of
15
Civil Procedure.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
Dated: June 29, 2012
18
KEVIN B. BRIGGS
County Counsel
19
20
By:
21
22
23
/s/ Michael Linden
Michael R. Linden, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendants
MARGARET MIMS, et al.
Dated: June 29, 2012
24
COOLEY LLP
25
By:
26
27
/s/ Maureen Alger
Maureen P. Alger
Attorney for Plaintiffs
28
2
Stipulation and Order Modifying
Preliminary Scheduling Order
Case No. 1:11-cv-02047-LJO-BAM
1
ORDER
2
Based on the Stipulation of the parties (Doc. 41), and for good cause shown, the
3
Court modifies the Scheduling Order (Doc. 39) to permit the parties to serve initial
4
disclosures no later than July 31, 2012.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
July 11, 2012
9
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC _Signature- END:
10
10c20kb8554
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation and Order Modifying
Preliminary Scheduling Order
Case No. 1:11-cv-02047-LJO-BAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?