Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Porges et al.

Filing 39

NOTICE of Intent to Strike Answers, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/9/13. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 100 PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., CASE NO. CV F 11-2048 LJO SKO NOTICE ANSWERS 13 OF INTENT TO STRIKE Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 WILLIAM CHARLES PORGES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 / 18 Defendants William Charles Porges (“Mr. Porges”) and Porges Enterprises, Inc. (“Porges, Inc.”) 19 proceed in this action without representation by counsel. Porges, Inc., as a corporation, may appear in 20 this action only through counsel. See Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993). Porges, 21 Inc. has disobeyed the February 22, 2013 order to secure counsel within 30 days. Mr. Porges and Porges, 22 Inc. failed to participate to file a joint pretrial statement as required by Local Rule 281(a). Accordingly 23 and on the basis of good cause, this Court NOTIFIES Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc. of this Court’s intent 24 to strike their answer, unless no later than May 13, 2013: 25 1. Porges, Inc. appears in this action through counsel; and 26 2. Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc. file and serve papers to show good cause for their failure to 27 28 file a joint pretrial statement and to defend meaningfully the claims against them. If Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc.’s answer is stricken, this Court will order plaintiffs to seek default 1 1 entry and judgment against Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc. 2 3 The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc. at Accelerated Electric, Inc., 855K South Main Street, #441, Fallbrook, CA 92028. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?