Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Porges et al.
Filing
39
NOTICE of Intent to Strike Answers, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/9/13. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF IBEW
LOCAL UNION NO. 100 PENSION
TRUST FUND, et al.,
CASE NO. CV F 11-2048 LJO SKO
NOTICE
ANSWERS
13
OF INTENT TO STRIKE
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
WILLIAM CHARLES PORGES, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
/
18
Defendants William Charles Porges (“Mr. Porges”) and Porges Enterprises, Inc. (“Porges, Inc.”)
19
proceed in this action without representation by counsel. Porges, Inc., as a corporation, may appear in
20
this action only through counsel. See Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993). Porges,
21
Inc. has disobeyed the February 22, 2013 order to secure counsel within 30 days. Mr. Porges and Porges,
22
Inc. failed to participate to file a joint pretrial statement as required by Local Rule 281(a). Accordingly
23
and on the basis of good cause, this Court NOTIFIES Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc. of this Court’s intent
24
to strike their answer, unless no later than May 13, 2013:
25
1.
Porges, Inc. appears in this action through counsel; and
26
2.
Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc. file and serve papers to show good cause for their failure to
27
28
file a joint pretrial statement and to defend meaningfully the claims against them.
If Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc.’s answer is stricken, this Court will order plaintiffs to seek default
1
1
entry and judgment against Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc.
2
3
The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Mr. Porges and Porges, Inc. at Accelerated
Electric, Inc., 855K South Main Street, #441, Fallbrook, CA 92028.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 9, 2013
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
66h44d
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?