Dews v. Superior Court of State of California
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING 19 and 20 Motions for Copy of Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/03/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CLARENCE LEON DEWS,
10
1:11-cv-02050-BAM (HC)
Petitioner,
11
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTIONS
FOR COPY OF DOCUMENTS
v.
[Docs. 19 & 20]
12
13
SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
14
Respondent.
/
15
16
On February 10, 2012, the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28
17
U.S.C. § 2254 was dismissed for failure to state a cognizable constitutional claim. The Court
18
sent Petitioner the standard form to proceed with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
20
On February 21 and February 24, 2012, Petitioner filed motions requesting the Clerk of
Court to return and/or copy certain documents filed in this action.
21
Although Petitioner was granted in forma pauperis status in this action, he is not
22
ordinarily entitled to free copies of documents. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2250, the clerk is not entitled
23
required to furnish copies without cost to an indigent petitioner except by order of the judge.
24
Petitioner requests a blanket request for copies of all documents submitted to this Court, which is
25
not sufficient to make a determination of necessity. If Petitioner desires copies of certain
26
documents, the Clerk of Court charges $.50 per page for copies of documents, plus $11.00 per
27
document for certification. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).
28
///
1
1
2
3
4
Based on the foregoing, Petitioner’s motions for copies of documents filed in this action
is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k
August 3, 2012
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?