Dews v. Superior Court of State of California

Filing 21

ORDER DENYING 19 and 20 Motions for Copy of Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/03/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CLARENCE LEON DEWS, 10 1:11-cv-02050-BAM (HC) Petitioner, 11 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTIONS FOR COPY OF DOCUMENTS v. [Docs. 19 & 20] 12 13 SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 14 Respondent. / 15 16 On February 10, 2012, the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 17 U.S.C. § 2254 was dismissed for failure to state a cognizable constitutional claim. The Court 18 sent Petitioner the standard form to proceed with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 20 On February 21 and February 24, 2012, Petitioner filed motions requesting the Clerk of Court to return and/or copy certain documents filed in this action. 21 Although Petitioner was granted in forma pauperis status in this action, he is not 22 ordinarily entitled to free copies of documents. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2250, the clerk is not entitled 23 required to furnish copies without cost to an indigent petitioner except by order of the judge. 24 Petitioner requests a blanket request for copies of all documents submitted to this Court, which is 25 not sufficient to make a determination of necessity. If Petitioner desires copies of certain 26 documents, the Clerk of Court charges $.50 per page for copies of documents, plus $11.00 per 27 document for certification. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). 28 /// 1 1 2 3 4 Based on the foregoing, Petitioner’s motions for copies of documents filed in this action is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10c20k August 3, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?