Lindell et al v. Synthes USA et al
Filing
29
ORDER Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Local Rule 144: Defendants answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint by 3/29/2012. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/9/2012. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TROY M. LINDELL AND MARK POPE, ON
BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER
SIMILARLY SITUATED,
10
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULE 144
Plaintiffs,
11
vs.
12
13
Case No. 11-cv-02053-LJO-BAM
SYNTHES USA, SYNTHES USA SALES LLC,
SYNTHES SPINE COMPANY, LP,
14
Defendants.
15
The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First
16
17
Amended Class Action Complaint (“Stipulation”) and good cause appearing,
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
19
1. The Stipulation is approved; and
20
2. Defendants Synthes USA, Synthes USA Sales LLC and Synthes Spine Company,
21
LP have to and including March 29, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to
22
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint.
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
March 9, 2012
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
DEAC_Signature-END:
28
10c20kb8554
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?