Lindell et al v. Synthes USA et al

Filing 29

ORDER Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Local Rule 144: Defendants answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint by 3/29/2012. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/9/2012. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TROY M. LINDELL AND MARK POPE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED, 10 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 144 Plaintiffs, 11 vs. 12 13 Case No. 11-cv-02053-LJO-BAM SYNTHES USA, SYNTHES USA SALES LLC, SYNTHES SPINE COMPANY, LP, 14 Defendants. 15 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First 16 17 Amended Class Action Complaint (“Stipulation”) and good cause appearing, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 19 1. The Stipulation is approved; and 20 2. Defendants Synthes USA, Synthes USA Sales LLC and Synthes Spine Company, 21 LP have to and including March 29, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to 22 Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: March 9, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 DEAC_Signature-END: 28 10c20kb8554 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?