Lindell et al v. Synthes USA et al

Filing 50

ORDER Dismissing Mark Pope, With Prejudice, As A Plaintiff And As A Member Of The Putative Class, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/18/2012. Mark Pope and Mark Pope terminated. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 TROY M. LINDELL AND MARK POPE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, 13 14 Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 1:11-CV-02053-LJO-BAM ORDER DISMISSING MARK POPE, WITH PREJUDICE, AS A PLAINTIFF AND AS A MEMBER OF THE PUTATIVE CLASS 15 16 SYNTHES USA, SYNTHES USA SALES LLC, SYNTHES SPINE COMPANY, LP, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 11-CV-02053-LJO-BAM [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING MARK POPE, WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss Mark Pope, with Prejudice, as a Plaintiff and as a Member of the Putative Class, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as follows: 4 1. Mark Pope shall be dismissed, with prejudice, as a plaintiff and as a member of the 5 putative plaintiff class from this Action, and therefore, Mark Pope will not share in 6 any recovery in this Action, if any; 7 2. Synthes’ counterclaims against Mark Pope will be dismissed with prejudice, although 8 Synthes’ claim for Declaratory Relief against Plaintiff Lindell for unreimbursed 9 business expenses will not be affected; and 10 3. Synthes will not seek any fees and/or costs against Mark Pope in connection with 11 Mark Pope’s bankruptcy proceedings or in this Action. 12 The clerk is directed not to close this action. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 18, 2012 Dated: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signatu re-END: 19 20 66h44d 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 1:11-CV-02053-LJO-BAM 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING MARK POPE, WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?