Dhar v. HP Sears
Filing
7
ORDER After Settlement 6 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/10/12. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
UNLEED DHAR,
10
CASE NO. CV F 11-2094 LJO JLT
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 6.)
11
HP SEARS,
12
13
Defendant.
____________________________/
14
15
Plaintiff’s counsel filed papers to indicate this action has settled and to request up to 60 days to
16
file papers to dismiss this action. Plaintiff fails to explain the need for such a lengthy time to complete
17
settlement and to file papers to dismiss this action. As such, this Court ORDERS plaintiff, no later than
18
February 23, 2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to
19
outline the status of settlement completion.
20
21
This Court VACATES all pending dates and matters, including the April 4, 2012 scheduling
conference.
22
23
Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or
parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
66h44d
27
28
January 10, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?