Jason Jones et al v. State of California et al

Filing 11

ORDER REVOKING 6 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis Status; ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fee in Full, in the amount of $350.00, within twenty one days, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/11/2012. (21) Day Deadline (copy to CDCR, Fresno Financial and Sacramento Financial) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JASON EARL JONES, et al., 11 12 CASE NO. 1:11-cv-02104-AWI-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS v. (ECF No. 6) 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN TWENTYONE DAYS / 16 17 Plaintiff Jason Earl Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 18 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis status on January 4, 20 2012. ECF No. 6. 21 The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that “[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a 22 civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated 23 or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was 24 dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief 25 may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 26 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A review of court records has revealed that Plaintiff accrued at least three 27 dismissals as malicious, frivolous, or for failure to state a claim as of May 19, 2010. The Court 28 takes judicial notice of the following cases that qualify as strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 1 1915(g): Jones v. Karpinski, et al., No. 2:08-cv-08495-UA-MLG (C.D. Cal.) (dismissed Jan. 15, 2 2009 as frivolous); Jones v. United States of America, et al., No. 1:09-cv-00849-UNA (D.D.C.) 3 (dismissed Jun. 25, 2009 for failure to state a claim); Jones v. Karpinski, et al., No. 1:10-cv- 4 00560-UNA (D.D.C.) (dismissed May 19, 2010 as frivolous). Plaintiff thus is not allowed to 5 proceed in forma pauperis in this action unless Plaintiff can demonstrate Plaintiff is “under 6 imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 7 “[T]he availability of the [imminent danger] exception turns on the conditions a prisoner 8 faced at the time the complaint was filed, not at some earlier or later time.” Andrews v. 9 Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007). To meet the imminent danger requirement, the 10 threat or prison condition must be real and proximate, Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 11 (7th Cir. 2003), and the danger of serious physical injury must exist at the time the complaint is 12 filed, Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 238 F.3d 307, 313-14 (3d Cir. 2001); Medberry v. Butler, 185 13 F.3d 1189, 1193 (11th Cir. 1999); Ashley v. Dilworth, 147 F.3d 715, 717 (8th Cir. 1998). 14 Plaintiff names numerous Defendants, including the California Correctional Peace 15 Officers Association, the CDCR, the California Department of Justice, several former and 16 current public officials, and prison officials at Kern Valley State Prison. Plaintiff accuses them 17 of retaliation, libel, and racketeering. Plaintiff does not qualify for the imminent danger 18 exception. 19 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is revoked; 21 2. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order by 22 23 which to submit the full $350.00 filing fee; 3. 24 25 dismissed without prejudice; 4. 26 27 28 If Plaintiff fails to timely submit the full filing fee in this action, this action will be The Clerk of the Court is directed to return to Plaintiff any partial payment of the filing fee in this action, if any; 5. CDCR is no longer required to collect payments from Plaintiff’s prison trust account to pay the filing fee for this action; and 2 1 6. 2 3 4 5 The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the director of the CDCR or his designee. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 October 11, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?