LeCompte v. Dhah et al
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING Defendant Dhah's 31 Application to CONTINUE Dates in Discovery and Scheduling Order; ORDER EXTENDING Dates as to All Parties, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/5/2014. Deadline to Amend: June 9, 2014; Discovery Cut-off: July 8, 2014; Dispositive Motion Deadline: September 8, 2014. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY LECOMPTE,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
DHAH, et al.,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:11cv02105 LJO DLB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DHAH’S
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DATES IN
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER
(Document 31)
ORDER EXTENDING DATES AS TO
ALL PARTIES
17
Plaintiff Timothy LeCompte (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
18
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil
19
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
The Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order on December 10, 2013. At the time, all
Defendants had not yet appeared.
Subsequently, on February 3, 2014, Defendant Dhah filed an answer. The Court extended the
application of the Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Dhah on February 28, 2014.
Also on February 28, 2014, Defendant Dhah requested a sixty (60) day continuance of the
deadline to amend, the discovery cut-off date and the dispositive motion deadline.
Defendant Dhah’s request is GRANTED. To maintain consistency throughout this action, the
Court extends the deadlines, as follows, for all Defendants and Plaintiff.
28
1
1
2
3
Deadline to Amend:
June 9, 2014
Discovery Cut-off:
July 8, 2014
Dispositive Motion Deadline:
September 8, 2014
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
March 5, 2014
7
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
8
L. Beck
3b142a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?