Starr v. CDCR
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations 57 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 27 , [37, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/18/13. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBIN GILLEN STARR,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
vs.
CDCR, et al.,
Defendants.
1:11-cv-02108-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 57.)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Docs. 27, 37.)
_____________________________/
17
Robin Gillen Starr (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant
19
to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On January 29, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
21
Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on July 18, 2012 and August 28, 2012, be
22
denied. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and
23
recommendations within thirty days. To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise
24
responded to the findings and recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
26
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
28
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
3
4
2013, are adopted in full; and
2.
5
6
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 29,
Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on July 18, 2012 and August
28, 2012, are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
0m8i78
March 18, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?