Ali v. Capital One
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.'s 26 Motion for Leave to Allow Party Representative to Appear Telephonically at the Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/15/2012. (Marrujo, C)
1 DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP
HUNTER R. ELEY (SBN 224321)
2 heley@dollamir.com
CHELSEA L. HAMILL (SBN 271859)
3 chamill@dollamir.com
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1850
4 Los Angeles, California 90067
Tel: 310.557.9100
5 Fax: 310.557.9101
6 Attorneys for Defendant
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
7 erroneously sued as CAPITAL ONE
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO
Error! Main Document Only. D OLL A MIR
& E LEY LLP
10
11
Case No. 1:11-CV-02115-SKO
Assigned to Judge Sheila K. Oberto
12
13
KARIMA ALI,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
v.
CAPITAL ONE,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ALLOW
PARTY REPRESENTATIVE TO
APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT
THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Location:
Magistrate Judge:
October 18, 2012
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 9
Dennis L. Beck
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO ALLOW PARTY REPRESENTATIVE TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
ORDER
For good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendant Capital One Bank
3 (USA), N.A.’s Motion For Leave To Allow Its Party Representative To Appear
4 Telephonically At The Settlement Conference scheduled for October 18, 2012 at
5 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 of the above-captioned Court.
6
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
October 15, 2012
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Error! Main Document Only. D OLL A MIR
& E LEY LLP
DEAC_Signature-END:
11
3b142a
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO ALLOW PARTY REPRESENTATIVE TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?