Singleton, Sr. v. Biter, et al.
Filing
14
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 11 and Dismissing Certain Claims, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/2/13. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
LAMAR SINGLETON, SR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
M.D. BITER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:12cv00043 AWI DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND
DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS
(Document 11)
16
Plaintiff Lamar Singleton, Sr., (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
17
18
forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on January 9, 2012. The
19
matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and
20
Local Rule 302.
21
22
On February 12, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations
regarding dismissal of certain claims.1 The Findings and Recommendations were served on
23
Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to
24
25
26
be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and
Recommendations.
27
1
28
Plaintiff has returned service documents for the cognizable claims and the documents have been forwarded to the
United States Marshal for service.
1
1
2
3
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 12, 2013, are ADOPTED in
6
7
full; and
2.
8
The Fourteenth Amendment claims are DISMISSED.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: April 2, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
13
14
0m8i788
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?