Singleton, Sr. v. Biter, et al.

Filing 14

ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 11 and Dismissing Certain Claims, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/2/13. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 LAMAR SINGLETON, SR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. M.D. BITER, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12cv00043 AWI DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS (Document 11) 16 Plaintiff Lamar Singleton, Sr., (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on January 9, 2012. The 19 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 20 Local Rule 302. 21 22 On February 12, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations regarding dismissal of certain claims.1 The Findings and Recommendations were served on 23 Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to 24 25 26 be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 27 1 28 Plaintiff has returned service documents for the cognizable claims and the documents have been forwarded to the United States Marshal for service. 1 1 2 3 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 12, 2013, are ADOPTED in 6 7 full; and 2. 8 The Fourteenth Amendment claims are DISMISSED. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: April 2, 2013 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 13 14 0m8i788 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?