Singleton, Sr. v. Biter, et al.

Filing 56

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's Motion For Injunctive Relief (Doc.Nos. 49 , 53 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/4/2014. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

LAMAR SINGLETON, SR.,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
M.D. BITER, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12cv00043 AWI DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. Nos. 49, 53)

16
17

Plaintiff Lamar Singleton, Sr., (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

18

forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This action is proceeding against Defendants Biter and

19

Lopez for violation of the Eighth Amendment. On February 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion

20
21
22
23

which the Court construed as a motion for injunctive relief. The matter was referred to a United
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
Plaintiff’s motion be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties

24
25
26

and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days. Neither party has
filed objections.

27
28
1

1
2
3
4

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 14, 2014, are ADOPTED in

6

full; and

7
8
9

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Document 49) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated: April 4, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2