Singleton, Sr. v. Biter, et al.

Filing 73

ORDER Requiring Supplemental Briefing, If Any, Be Filed Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 06/12/14. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAMAR SINGLETON, SR., 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. M. D. BITER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12cv00043 AWI DLB (PC) ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING, IF ANY, BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS Plaintiff Lamar Singleton (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action on January 9, 2012. This action is proceeding against 19 Defendants Biter and Lopez for violation of the Eighth Amendment. 20 On April 17, 2014, the Court vacated Findings and Recommendations regarding Defendants’ 21 motion to dismiss based on exhaustion and converted the motion into a motion for summary judgment. 22 The Court also ordered the parties to inform the Court whether discovery related to exhaustion was 23 necessary within thirty days. 24 25 On April 30, 2014, Defendants confirmed that they did not need additional discovery. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order. 26 27 28 1 1 Accordingly, as it appears that no discovery is necessary, the Court ORDERS that 2 supplemental briefing, if any, be filed within thirty (30) days. If the parties wish to stand on the 3 briefing already filed, they must inform the Court of their intent within this time frame. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis June 12, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?