Singleton, Sr. v. Biter, et al.
Filing
75
ORDER vacating 73 Order regarding supplemental briefing signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/17/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAMAR SINGLETON, SR.,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
M. D. BITER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12cv00043 AWI DLB (PC)
ORDER VACATING ORDER REGARDING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
(Document 73)
Plaintiff Lamar Singleton (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis, filed this civil rights action on January 9, 2012. This action is proceeding against
19
Defendants Biter and Lopez for violation of the Eighth Amendment.
20
On April 17, 2014, the Court vacated Findings and Recommendations regarding Defendants’
21
motion to dismiss based on exhaustion and converted the motion into a motion for summary judgment.
22
The Court also ordered the parties to inform the Court whether discovery related to exhaustion was
23
necessary within thirty days.
24
On April 30, 2014, Defendants confirmed that they did not need additional discovery.
25
On June 13, 2014, after Plaintiff did not respond, the Court set a further briefing schedule for
26
27
28
the motion for summary judgment.
However, on June 12, 2014, the Court received Plaintiff’s motion for additional discovery.
The motion was signed on June 9, 2014, but was not docketed by the Court until June 13, 2014. In the
1
1
motion, Plaintiff cites medical issues and requests an extension of time. The Court will grant
2
Plaintiff’s request for additional time and VACATES the June 12, 2014, order setting forth a
3
supplemental briefing schedule.
4
5
Once Plaintiff’s motion for limited discovery is fully briefed, the Court will rule on Plaintiff’s
56(d) request and set an additional schedule, as necessary.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
June 17, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?