Singleton, Sr. v. Biter, et al.

Filing 77

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Regarding Plaintiff's Motion For Injunctive Relief (Document Nos. 69 , 70 , 72 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/2/2014. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

LAMAR SINGLETON, SR.,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
M.D. BITER, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12cv00043 AWI DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Document Nos. 69, 70, 72)

16
17

Plaintiff Lamar Singleton, Sr., (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

18

forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This action is proceeding against Defendants Biter and

19

Lopez for violation of the Eighth Amendment.

20
21
22

On May 22 and 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed motions which the Court construed as motions
for injunctive relief. The matters were referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

23

On May 29, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff’s motions be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties
and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party
has filed objections.

28
1

1
2
3
4

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 29, 2014, are ADOPTED in

6

full; and

7
8
9

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (Documents 69 and 70) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated: July 2, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2