Shofner, et al. v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, et al.

Filing 41

ORDER AMENDING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 27 to Reflect the County of Kern, Rather than the Kern County Parks and Recreation Department, as the Proper County Defendant, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/3/2012. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

MICHAEL SHOFNER et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

14
15
16
17

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:12-CV-00062- LJO-JLT
ORDER AMENDING FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT TO REFLECT THE COUNTY
OF KERN, RATHER THAN THE KERN
COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT, AS THE PROPER
COUNTY DEFENDANT

On November 28, 2012, the Court held the scheduling conference in this matter. (Doc. 40)

18

At that time, and on the record, the parties agreed that the Kern County Parks and Recreation

19

Department—which is a mere department of the County of Kern--is not a proper defendant in this

20

case. See United States v. Kama, 394 F.3d 1236, 1239 (9th Cir.2005) (Ferguson, J., concurring)

21

(noting that municipal police departments and bureaus are generally not considered “persons”

22

within the meaning of Section 1983); Vance, 928 F.Supp. at 995–96 (dismissing sua sponte Santa

23

Clara Department of Corrections as improper defendant); Jewett v. City of Sacramento Fire Dep't,

24

No. CIV. 2:10–556 WBS KJN, 2010 WL 3212774, at *2 (E.D. Aug. 12, 2010) (finding fire

25

department not a “person” under Section 1983 and dismissing suit against it); Wade v. Fresno

26

Police Dep't, No. Civ. 09–0588 AWI DLB, 2010 WL 2353525, at *4 (E.D.Cal. June 9, 2010)

27

(finding police department is not a “person” under Section 1983); Morris v. State Bar of Cal., No.

28

Civ. 09–0026 LJO GSA, 2010 WL 966423, at *3 (E.D.Cal. Mar.11, 2010) (finding that a fire
1

1

department is a municipal department and therefore not a “person” under Section 1983); Sanders v.

2

Aranas, No. 1:06–CV–1574 AWI SMS, 2008 WL 268972, at *3 (E.D.Cal. Jan.29, 2008) (finding

3

Fresno Police Department improper defendant because it is a sub-division of the City of Fresno);

4

Brockmeier v. Solano Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 2006 WL 3760276, *4 (E.D.Cal. Dec.18, 2006)

5

(dismissing Sheriff's Department as an improperly named defendant for purposes of Section 1983).

6

Thus, the parties stipulated that the complaint be amended to reflect the proper county defendant as

7

the County of Kern.

8

Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

9

1.

The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 27) is amended to delete reference to the

10

“Kern County Parks and Recreation Department” and the “County of Kern” is substituted in its

11

place.

12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 3, 2012

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

9j7khijed

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2